Post contributed by:
Mark Siemens,
University of Denver,
USA
The challenge in measuring OAM is that it is carried by the helicity of the phase, which cannot be measured with an intensity-only image. The simplest and oldest method for characterizing OAM is interference with a known reference beam. The spiral pattern is a clear indicator of twisted light [1], while the number of interference minima reveals the nearest-integer OAM value and the OAM sign can be can be inferred from the direction of the spiral if there is a radius of curvature difference between the beam under test and the reference. Diffraction from non-round apertures that break the azimuthal symmetry of a beam with OAM also yield a qualitative estimate of the OAM [2,3].
Direct quantitative measurement of the average OAM is also possible, but requires considerable care in alignment and interpretation. This is important for measuring beams that don’t have single-integer-valued OAM, which is inevitable for all experimental systems because small misalignments or optical irregularities deform the mode and change the OAM spectrum. Fractional OAM also arises when a spiral phase plate is inserted into a laser beam with a wavelength different from the design wavelength of the spiral phase plate. Recent experiments showed that the average fractional OAM can be measured quantitatively with a single cylindrical lens by calculating higher-order moments of the intensity pattern formed at the focal plane of the lens, see Fig. 1 [4].
Figure 1: OAM measurements with a single cylindrical lens. |
Of course, there are many other ways for measuring the OAM of light. Current research is mostly focused on accurate, efficient, and stable methods of measuring OAM spectra down to a single photon level, which opens up exciting opportunities of studying twisted light-matter interactions.
REFERENCES
[1] Soskin, M. S., Gorshkov, V., Vasnetsov, M., Malos, J., & Heckenberg, N. (1997). Topological charge and angular momentum of light beams carrying optical vortices. Physical Review A, 56(5), 4064–4075. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4064
[2] Guo, C.-S., Lu, L.-L., & Wang, H.-T. (2009). Characterizing topological charge of optical vortices by using an annular aperture. Optics Letters, 34(23), 3686–3688. http://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.003686
[3] Anderson, M. E., Bigman, H., de Araujo, L. E. E., & Chaloupka, J. L. (2012). Measuring the topological charge of ultrabroadband, optical-vortex beams with a triangular aperture. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 29(8), 1968–1976. http://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.001968
[4] Alperin, S. N., Niederriter, R. D., Gopinath, J. T., & Siemens, M. E. (2016). Quantitative measurement of the orbital angular momentum of light with a single , stationary lens. Optics Letters, 41(21), 5019–5022.
[5] Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G., & Zeilinger, A. (2001). Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature, 412(6844), 313–316. http://doi.org/10.1038/35085529
[6] Berkhout, G. C. G., Lavery, M. P. J., Courtial, J., Beijersbergen, M. W., & Padgett, M. J. (2010). Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. Physical Review Letters, 105(15), 8–11. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601
[7] Lavery, M. P. J., Robertson, D. J., Berkhout, G. C. G., Love, G. D., Padgett, M. J., & Courtial, J. (2012). Refractive elements for the measurement of the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Optics Express, 20(3), 2110–5. http://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.002110
0 comments:
Post a Comment